Showing posts with label biography. Show all posts
Showing posts with label biography. Show all posts

Friday, May 22, 2026

"The Revolutionary Samuel Adams" by Stacy Schiff

This book is less a biography of Samuel Adams and more a history of all the 18th-century politics he was involved in. And there's a reason for that; perhaps because his primary occupation was rabble-rousing, Adams was an incredibly private person. He wrote under dozens of different pseudonyms, we never know quite where he was at any one time (except when he needed an alibi; we know exactly where he was during the Boston Tea Party), and he seldom signed his letters. He's like the Invisible Man: we can't see him directly, but we kind of know where he is and what he's doing by looking at the aftereffects.

As was the fashion at the time, most of Samuel Adams's subversive newspaper articles were written under pseudonyms. My favorite one was "Vindex"; the actual Vindex was a Roman general who rebelled against Nero, but I was heartily amused by how it sounds like you're saying "Windex" with a vampire accent.

The book spends about a chapter on Adams's early life and about a chapter on his later life. They're not the important part. Also his life after the Revolution is kind of sad; he was very good at rabble-rousing, but got kind of lost and fell out of favor when rabble-rousing was now counterproductive in our newly formed nation and everybody had the rights he was yelling about not having.

But the parts in the middle are not sad. They are in fact kind of funny, with how the royal governors despair of their inability to actually do anything about this one guy who they know, but cannot prove, keeps writing subversive essays and turning the town of Boston against them. And then the one time they try taking him out is foiled by Paul Revere.

Were this a videogame, I'd rate it: E10+, probably, for some violence.

4 stars.

Favorite lines:

    If you read only the essays in the papers you might reasonably conclude that ancient Romans peopled eighteenth-century New England.
    Page 159.

(Endnote: Von, two, three bottles of Vindex. Mwa-ha-ha-ha-ha.)

Saturday, May 13, 2023

"Wade McClusky and the Battle of Midway" by David Rigby

I suppose this all just goes to show that I am not used to reading adult history books.

For one thing, it sometimes felt like a full 20% of the book was citations. Pretty much any time the author mentioned a date, event, person's name, argument, number, piece of cheese, or cat, he cited a source for it. (Note: I don't think he actually mentioned any cheese or cats in this.)

I have been assured that such things are normal in such books, but it kinda surprised me.

While reading a particular section, I was reminded of a line from a Cul de Sac comic: "I have only just begun to delve into the infinite possibilities of minutia." The section in question was about how many planes attacked the carrier Akagi during the battle; after citing more sources than I would have thought possible and writing down the thoughts on the matter of every eyewitness he could find, Rigby concluded that there were almost assuredly five planes attacking the Akagi, not three or eight.

The author spent a lot of time refuting the popular (apparently) opinion that McClusky didn't know what he was doing during the Battle of Midway. I think he succeeded, as I came away convinced that he did in fact know what he was doing. It got a little repetitive after a while, though.

About half the book was a biography of Wade McClusky himself. (I can never type his name right on the first try, by the way; I always mistype it McClusly or something and have to correct myself.) Then the other half was the battle of Midway, which sort of came in the middle of the biography. This makes sense, but it was still like "Biography biography biography !MIDWAY! biography biography."

Due to dragging in parts, I'm giving this three stars.

Were this a videogame, its subject matter would get rated: Like with my review of The Great War, M to AO. War is... not pleasant, y'all.
However, the book handles it in a way that's more: E10+. Fine for younger people, but they probably wouldn't want to read 350 pages of mostly nitpicking and citations.

As with every time I read and review something my mom also has, here's a link to her review.